Shape the future of IBM watsonx Orchestrate

Start by searching and reviewing ideas others have posted, and add a comment (private if needed), vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you.

If you can't find what you are looking for, create a new idea:

  1. stick to one feature enhancement per idea

  2. add as much detail as possible, including use-case, examples & screenshots (put anything confidential in Hidden details field or a private comment)

  3. Explain business impact and timeline of project being affected

[For IBMers] Add customer/project name, details & timeline in Hidden details field or a private comment (only visible to you and the IBM product team).

This all helps to scope and prioritize your idea among many other good ones. Thank you for your feedback!

Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use
Learn more about IBM watsonx Orchestrate - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the product.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Add idea Subscribe
Status Submitted
Created by Guest
Created on Oct 9, 2026

RELATED IDEAS

MIRROR-CHECK — misperception and bias detector for intelligence assessment

Problem: Korea 1950, the Falklands 1982, Kuwait 1990 — every case traces back to one side misreading the other's capabilities or resolve. Intelligence scholarship (Jervis onward) shows analysts systematically mirror-image adversaries and leave assumptions unexamined, and no standard tooling forces structured bias-checking into the assessment workflow. Idea: Add an Orchestrate agent that applies structured analytic techniques — devil's advocacy, analysis of competing hypotheses — to draft intelligence assessments of adversary intent, flagging conclusions that rest on unexamined assumptions about what the other side wants or will tolerate. The agent challenges the draft; humans decide. Value: Assessments that survive contact with the adversary's actual mind. The unglamorous missing link behind most deterrence failures gets a systematic check.

Idea priority Low
  • Post comment

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Add Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not include IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information in any field.
Having problems accessing this portal? Describe the problems in an email to ideasibm@us.ibm.com.