Shape the future of IBM watsonx Orchestrate

Start by searching and reviewing ideas others have posted, and add a comment (private if needed), vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you.

If you can't find what you are looking for, create a new idea:

  1. stick to one feature enhancement per idea

  2. add as much detail as possible, including use-case, examples & screenshots (put anything confidential in Hidden details field or a private comment)

  3. Explain business impact and timeline of project being affected

[For IBMers] Add customer/project name, details & timeline in Hidden details field or a private comment (only visible to you and the IBM product team).

This all helps to scope and prioritize your idea among many other good ones. Thank you for your feedback!

Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use
Learn more about IBM watsonx Orchestrate - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the product.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Add idea Subscribe
Status Future consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Jan 22, 2025

RELATED IDEAS

[AI Agent Routing] Presenting multiple routing options to users

We have projects leveraging tens of assistants for user request handling. No matter how those assistants are grouped and descriptions are well written, there will always be situation where we'll need more disambiguation. The idea that we are proposing here is to present multiple routing options to the user in the chat so that the user can select the best one from the list.

We also want to be able to configure routing options setting in a way that routing options are presented based on confidence threshold (min. %), min~max # of options, etc.

When there is no option that meets the confident threshold, the default get the LLM answer should be done, but provide some "suggestions" with options that are lower than the high-threshold (80%). For example, our threshold is 80% but none of the options meet the high bar. In that case, instead of showing the LLM answer (default behavior) alone, we want to also present those options that are lower than the bar presenting to user as "suggestions".

Idea priority Urgent
  • Post comment

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Add Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not include IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information in any field.
Having problems accessing this portal? Describe the problems in an email to ideasibm@us.ibm.com.